To: K-list 
Recieved: 2004/05/15  01:47  
Subject: [K-list] definition of ego 
From: Djamelbensmaia
  
On 2004/05/15  01:47, Djamelbensmaia posted thus to the K-list: 
  
 
 
Selon David Bozzi <david.bozziATsofthome.net>: 
 
 
  Hi David, List, 
 
>  
> Ego is undefinable. 
 
  Why couldn't we define ego? For instance, I would think the common definition  
of ego says it's  a certain  
mechanism that evolved conscious beings  like us humans came up with to  
intentionnally ignore reality in order to fulfill illusory desires; a very  
intelligent and complex auto-deceptive mechanism, that creates and perpetuates  
illusion. 
  Because ego doesn't exist doesn't mean it cannot be defined. You can define  
"lie", "illusion";  
  On the other hand, I think it's also safe to say that ego, as it is linked to  
desire, and  
associated with basic survival issues, pain, pleasure, life and death, and so  
on, is more largly a  
characteristic of all limited life forms: men, insects, even bacteria, display  
ego;  
consequently, it is evident that besides being the major pain in the --- of  
yogis and such, it is and has been primarily a most precious survival  
mechanism, scientists can therefore study it, and give their own definition, in  
scientific terms, of what spirituality has called "ego", and vice versa. 
  It seems it's only when man began _searching_ for reality, _choosing_ freely  
between wrong and right, illusion and reality, the world and God, that ego  
finally appeared as a possibly problematic, and a  rather regressive, simian,  
state of  
being and functionning,which makes it perhaps more precious to us still, since  
the observation of ego's limitation and shortcomings gave birth to the notion  
of non-ego, the path, liberation, you name it.. 
 
  All that to say, IMO, it _can_ be defined; what _can not_ be defined are  
terms like "unity", "existence", because nothing we add to these terms could  
help us get a clearer idea of their meaning; from a strictly philosophical -  
logical - standpoint, those are the only circumstances where definitions are  
useless.  
 
  Djamel  
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2004/k20041248.html
 |