To: K-list 
Recieved: 2003/03/02  13:34  
Subject: Re: [K-list] ... By the way, little angry KEN, read this. 
From: mundane zen
  
On 2003/03/02  13:34, mundane zen posted thus to the K-list: 
 Dear OMA, 
 
 
>Now on to little angry Ken. 
 
 
Angry?  No.  Little?  No, I'm 6'3" 205 lbs.  Wrong on both counts. 
>Something very human wants to speak with you. Look, I don't give a 
>shit about your opinion or your beliefs. 
 
 
And the point is?  Is your caring about my opinion a prerequisite for  
replying to a post? 
>You don't have to care about mine, but I really don't give a SHIT >about  
>yours. 
 
 
Then why are you responding? 
>And also, there's a difference between jerking back(like when someone 
>pops around a corner and shouts "BOO", you jump.) when you get burned, >and  
>instinct. 
 
 
Sure, strictly speaking, those are autonomic responses.  The fear of heights  
is more properly called an instinct.  Yet, both are hard-wired.  Free will  
doesn't play any role whatsoever.  Even this angry reply of yours is mere  
stimulus (my last post) and response.  So, it's questionable as to what  
degree of free will was involved, if any. 
>You can go along, scurrying around on the floor of life, believing we 
>were a puddle of piss before we evolved into fish, amphibians, 
>reptiles, monkeys, then humans, I don't care. 
 
 
This is an irrational strawman attack.  I'm sure a debate on evolution is  
off-topic, so I won't get into it.  Suffice it to say that the process of  
evolution is an observed fact (in bacteria, fish, lizards, moths, etc.), and  
that the Theory of Evolution is backed-up by solid evidence from the fossil  
record, genetics, etc. 
 
Whether you care or not is irrelevant.  If you post your prattle on the  
list, you run the risk of getting a response.  So get over it. 
>I wasn't about to respond to you if you went on about the big bang, 
>but when you do it to me just because I believe in God and not some 
>huge rock that came out of nowhere, I have a problem with that. 
 
 
So here's more strawman crap with this "big rock out of nowhere".  I don't  
begrudge you your beliefs, but if you go around acting like a arrogant  
know-it-all, misrepresenting science, using circular logic, and spewing  
little nothings about thought arising from motivation and free will, then  
you can expect to be called on it. 
>My opinion's are open for discussion, not for argument. 
 
 
Who are you to dictate terms? 
>Let's make a deal too. You don't say shit to me and I won't say shit 
>to you. 
 
 
You've already broken the deal before it began. 
>Before you ever give me your opinion again, stop and ask me if I give 
>a shit. 
 
 
No. 
 
 
ken 
 
_ 
   
 
 
 
To adjust your subscription or get a reminder of your password, visit: 
http://kundalini-gateway.org/mailman/listinfo/k-list_kundalini-gateway.org 
 
  
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2003b/k2003b1333.html
 |