To: K-list 
Recieved: 2002/10/25  18:02  
Subject: RE: [K-list] Karma and Responsibility 
From: Rich
  
On 2002/10/25  18:02, Rich posted thus to the K-list: Dear Mystress,
 
Well.... I should be careful... I started writing a challenging reply to 
your e-mail and my computer crashed bad. (This is now about 2 weeks 
later).
 
So I had to reconsider.... What is this responsibility - Is it one way 
of considering karma flow. Does it really matter? Does it make life 
easier?
 
Well the answer I think is yes, but not to think about it. Well, I am grateful for your writing. It seems so carefully thought out 
but I still don't grasp it the same way you do. I was trying to look for 
the exception. Maybe that was my mistake. But I like to be rock solid 
about something before I take on a new belief. Is it *really* this 
way... Okay enough of my dribble.
 
Let's throw a question into the pot.Is a baby responsible for the karma it accrues from its parents ? By 
this I mean the imprinted (or adopted) karmic patterns of it's parents 
as well as the unconditionally received baggage.
 
The likely answer is yes as the baby caused the conditions from it's 
actions of the past. The baby choose this life etc. At some level it 
asked for that. But maybe not the specific details.But let me try to understand this from Goddess view...
 
If karma follows responsibilty and goddess is all then goddess has full 
responsibility and likewise ultimate ownership of all karma. If we 
assume the state of being goddess then we are taking our own held 
responsibility back to it's source and consequently the karma. This is 
how I see this. Really there is no karma for it is only our resistance 
to experiencing what is.
 
In being nothing, we can have it all. But there is no attachment. This 
is the thing about karma.
 
Karma is only felt when there is resistance to it. Being goddess means 
zero resistance as there is no attachment. So the karma automatically is 
surrendered. The resistance is really attachment to wanting something 
different to what we have. A displacement of time. This is the 'cling' 
factor - the more acceptance to all that is and the less desire to 
change it, the less 'clingy-ness'. But lets consider irresponsibility - This to me is what build karma up, 
if not in ourself, certainly in others where they are effected. This is 
the generator of karma. So being 'irresponsible' is like dipping our 
karma recepticles out into the ocean of life and feeding off the dirt 
for a while. 
 
When we need to clean them then we can put them in responsible goddess's 
mouth to suck off the algae and the stuck bits until they are nice and 
clean again.So the games go on like this for me...
 
Any involvement means deciding to own (co-create) a bit of creation and 
this will continue to until the thing winds-down (no more energy being 
put into it) or it's surrendered back and dis-owned (dis-created). But 
with involvement does not necessarily come responsibility. I can be 
involved but detached. Like getting drunk and doing something silly or 
like being reckless in a game of football and acting mindlessly.
 
However, If the involvement is extended from goddess and not from ego, 
it's very easy to or unnecessary to surrender as it was never owned to 
begin with. There is no personal responsibility and there need be no 
attachment.Sometimes great leaps can be made in advancement or expansion by 
allowing the karma to bubble up and then disintegrate through heated 
conflict. Like I wasn't willing to take on someones baggage at work but 
the relationship was becoming more tense. Eventually I confronted it and 
learnt the person was asking why, why, why about everything. He was 
turned against himself in a way. I joked with him and put some basic 
questions on the board like why are you here?, what makes you happy? 
what is your purpose? And got him to start questioning that instead... 
We had many laughs and he seemed the happiest I've seen him for a long 
time and eventually asked me if we could do some more things like this 
with some ofther people. 
 
So I realised there was a shift but then the person fell back into their 
old ways. Anyway, where do I go with this... Well in a nutshell. My belief is that 
karma follows the easiest channel. Like water back to the ocean. 
 
If there is an opening karma will easily move to that. It's very 
natural. If a person is weak in one way they attract the karma of others 
on to them. This doesn't mean they are responsible. When a person is 
overflowing with karma it's like there causing a flood into everyone 
with an open channel. Often from my experience people want to avoid 
these types of people as it makes them feel worse as they can't release 
the karma always.
 
When a person is filled with love and light they don't take on karma so 
easily. But when I extend my empathy to someone I give a channel to 
receive their karma. Is this the same as responsibility? Not 
neccessarily in my opinion. If I give someone my empathy I not trying to 
own anything, just to understand better and help them to communicate. 
How can I love them better is a question I often ask. How can I remove 
the barriers between this person and I to facilitate greater clarity and 
understanding. 
 
I would suggest the *first* action in *resolving* karma is taking 
responsibility for it. Without this there is no way to let it go. We 
can't let go of what we don't own. 
 
But as far as karma following responsibility. I would suggest they are 
very closely linked that responsibility increases as our capacity to 
handle karma does, but as far as what karma follows, I would suggest it 
follows that where it can go. To where there is a pocket of emptiness to 
be filled. 
A few other unrelated comments below...>    Hierarchies. That is what it is with Gurus getting liver disease,  
> and why American presidents age about 12 years for every 4 year term.  
> Responsibility for what happens, what Is,  flows to them, they are the 
> decision makers. Leadership.
 
Perhaps, they've turned their own power against themself. Why was Hitler 
so successful for so long? Because he cycled the energy back out to the 
people? Eventually he lost his capability to do this as doubt got into 
him. It's unshakeable confidence that makes a leader so strong in my 
opinion. Such confidence sucks doubt out of people and makes them easy 
to be followers.
 
>     They could escape a lot of it by obeying democracy, turning  
> decisions back to the people to decide...
 
But the people as a mass are confused and would start to blame each 
other and the system and then we have civil wars.  Was it Winston 
Churchill who wrote if you can please some people all of the time and 
all people some of the time you are doing well.
 
>     Additionally, you have set them up there as your idol for target  
> practice... blame is bombing someone with your karma. Like shooting  
> black magic arrows at them... and the karma feedback from that 
> aggressive action  
> will make things worse... sliding down a deeper and deeper hole into  
> victimhood... not empowerment.
 
Actually I've noticed for some people they get off on this. They like 
the power it gives them to be blamed and hated. 
 
>     There is more to it.. what you have written is not wrong, it is a  
> perspective. Subtle shading on the meaning of responsibility, and  
> irresponsibility.
 
I think there's different contexts as well. Karma can follow 
responsibility. But it's more like Karma follows involvement and Karma 
can only be taken over through responsibility and subsequently resolved.
 
Thanks for the post again... And Wow.. What a wonderful offering you 
have regarding the Tummo fire... Please count me in :)
 
I'm curious about how this works... Do you open a channel to allow this 
to work? Is it under control or is it something we learn to work with 
like K?
 
Where or what is the source of Tummo? I'm very eager to understand this 
more....  
Hope you don't mind the questions and I've enjoyed the discussion in 
regard to Karma and Responsibility, even if it drove me nuts in the 
process.
 
:)Rich... The karmicist  
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2002b/k200206132.html
 |