To: K-list 
Recieved: 2002/02/20  14:37  
Subject: [K-list] Re: Kundalini: Destination or Scenery? 
From: Druout
  
On 2002/02/20  14:37, Druout posted thus to the K-list: In a message dated 2/20/2002 8:23:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
copithorneATnospamacninc.net writes:
 
> At the same time, my gut reaction is that Buddhism is based on the  
experience  
>  of suffering, not the experience of Kundalini.
 
Dear Mark,
 
I'm not sufficiently familiar with Buddhism to really comment, but I suspect  
that Buddha's actual metaphysical experiences were based on this same  
Spiritual Energy.  How it is interpreted by religious founders, is IMO how  
different religions are born. 
>   
> It makes a difference whether we understand Kundalini as the destination or  
> as  
>  just more scenery along the way. In theistic traditions, Kundalini can  
> become  
>  the goal and the aim is to get higher and higher and higher. In Buddhism,  
>  whatever experience arises passes away and cultivating Kundalini is simply  
>  creating more karma, more bondage.
 
Well, my guess is that cultivating any "beliefs," takes you away from the  
present joy of being.  
>   
>  We have the miracles of sight, hearing, taste, touch, smell. Then, we have  
> the  miracle of Kundalini perception. [It is disorienting to go through  
life for  
> 25+   years and then suddenly discover a new sense organ!] 
 LOL!  
 
>Do we understand  
> Kundalini   perception to be senior to the other senses? Or is it just one  
more? Is what  we  see through the eye of Kundalini more true than what we  
see through the eye  of   sight?
 
Well for me Kundalini has heightened other senses--all chakras being  
potential pleasure centers.
 
>   
>  At this point, I understand Kundalini as just one more. Not bigger,  
better,  
>  higher, beyond the other senses.
 
For me, it simply allows greater awareness.  
 
  
>  Because even if you say that Kundalini is the source of religion,  
Kundalini  
> is  
>  still not enough. Charles Manson, David Koresh and many other destructive  
>  people have powerful Shakti. But they get lost in worshipping their  
> experience  
>  of Shakti as God. All religion may find its source in Kundalini  
experiences,  
>   but a lot of religion is evil garbage. So what else is there? 
>    I think my own tendencies to set up Kundalini as special, above, beyond  
tend  
> to   cause suffering.
 
Well, K is certainly a fascinating phenomena!  I don't see K awakened people  
as being special.  I was "told" early in my experience that everyone is  
already awake, they simply aren't aware of it.  
 
Love, Hillary
 --  http://www.kundalini-gateway.org  
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm 
 
 
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2002/k200200779.html
 |