To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/11/09 20:10
Subject: Re: [K-list] Re: DXM and misc. observations/remarks
From: Joshua Sutterfield

> > reciever of all of it. I just process it, he is the one who is "aware"
> > of my processes.
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Above you seem to be saying that God is outside of yourself. If that which

Yeah, heheh.. indeed it begins to seem like language itself is an act of
separation.. like you say, naming things.. we have to separate them out in
order to speak about them, in order to communicate. And so when I talk
about a traditional "me" which is separate from God, I end up sayign that
is a fallacy, that that is not God it all. Indeed it still is. Except
that as we are creator, so if we create separation, so it is..

By speaking about separation as something separate from unity, it
self-fulfills (and then I have created separation). I guess you see what
I was saying though.. if I invest "me" in the standard assumptions about
what I am, my body and mental processes, well then I am looking at
something "other" than the source of self, which is more like.. the
junction of body and mind (and all other things). But I just
contradicted myself.. if it is all other things, then this "other" thing
is yet another manifestation of self.. it is the isnot. the i snot.
Heheh. It's funny to think of a paradox as "alive."

Sometimes I get obsessed with prime numbers. I can see how Jewish
numerologists felt numbers were spiritual. Anyone have any thought about
prime numbers? One is one which is everything (though not prime, more
like beyond prime).. all primes are divisible only by one and self, kind
of the one thing they have in common. Then there is two, the tao, then
three, the trinity. Five, definitely significant.. though no absolutely
hard hitting re-appearing always-the-same pattern in my philosophical
world yet. 7, chakras etc.. I suppose humans generally just dig prime
numbers. 11, I think there's some buddhist stuff with 11 (course they
have 8's and lots of other things too). Why did I bring this up? I don
tknow maybe someone has a comment.. then again I was thinking how talking
too much about "paradoxes" was sort of a mathy topic and was becoming
distant from the focus of the list so I should stop yammering, instead I
got more mathy. Plus sometimes I make myself ill thinking about prime
numbers and stuff like that. Much better to sit and be still.

> You don't suppose God has been messing around with that DXM, do you? Wearing

Yeah, matter of fact, he just took some. Better go.

durp,
Josh

http://www.kundalini-gateway.org

DISCLAIMER!

---

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe

K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.

Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.

All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.

All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©

This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.

URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001b/k200105403.html