To: K-list 
Recieved: 2001/11/09  15:35  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Re: DXM and misc. observations/remarks 
From: felix
  
On 2001/11/09  15:35, felix posted thus to the K-list:  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <divine_goddessATnospamhotmail.com> 
<> 
> Either we believe in God or we know God. Or do we? Who knows? Not me. 
> But if we are to know God, we will have to come fully into the 
> present moment where God is. 
> 
> To know God means we are existing in the world created by the 
> thinking mind where exists the memories of the past and the fantasies 
> of the future. 
> 
> To be God is to become aware of the present moment of now. How does 
> one try to be God? By remembering or imagining what It is like? I 
> don't know. 
> 
> When we are in our mind we are not being God.
 
Hi Susan,
 
Reading that part of your post above is a bit synchronisitic for me. 
Recently I remembered a term I ran across in an unabridged dictionary : 
specious present. This term is very revealing way of describing the eternal 
now. I ran a search on it in Google ["specious + present"] and it turned up 
a bunch of sites where various disiplines argue about the parameters of the 
specious present, in general, how much time is involved or can be involved 
in between your "memories of the past" and the "fantasies of the future".
 
I read one site where this highly educated Methodist minister stated that 
God only ex-is-ts in the specious present, which led to an argument on 
another list I'm on about whether God is so caught up in creating and 
decision-making in that specious present that It is ignorant of everything 
but that.
 
Ordinarily, the present moment is the only ti-me anybody can do anything 
about being in the world. In some of the tantric techniques I have been 
reading about in the archives, it seems as though tantric results can only 
be achieved by letting go of the future and the past and dwelling in that 
eternal now with one's lover. It might appear that applies to either a 
spiritual or physical lover.
 
Certainly it seems that to be One with God would require that one give up 
reflecting on the memories of the past and the fantasies of the future just 
to dwell in the same state as God exists in. If the concentration were 
perfectly aligned such that one was with God in the specious present, the 
question then might be whether one could participate with God as God, as for 
as long as this could take place, experience the ecstasy of Godliness for as 
long as one could be there without remembering the past or fantasizing about 
the future. Once that happened, one might fall from grace, and to be sure, 
regret not being in God's presence mightily. LOL!!
 
What would an experience of this sort do to the ordinary expression of the 
libido? Getting off for twenty or thirty seconds might pale in comparison, 
and seemingly one could never go home again to a more mundane sexual 
activity without thinking the whole time that it was less than what is 
possible. It could be incentive to tear your mortal lover's flesh... could 
it not? ;-)
 
felix  http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
  
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001b/k200105395.html
 |