To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/11/06 16:20
Subject: Re: [2] Privacy and unfair play was Re:[2] [K-list] I SHOULD HAVE SAID food...
From: Druout

In a message dated 11/6/2001 12:40:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
nmastersATnospampurdue.edu writes:
>
> Did you read Mystress's message? Is it fair to take it to the private
level?
> What was the
> intention on taking this private?

Dear Nick,

Yes I read it loud and clear! LOLOL! The point in taking it private, of
course, is to give Jesse a needed rap with a zen stick. She didn't mean to
rap the whole list! ;) But, on the other hand, maybe the fact it was made
public means we all need a bit of ego slapping ;) Why should we care
whether someone says that one sex has more spiritual energy than another!
LOLOL Energy is limitless as Angelique so often says!

[ The thread was initially posted to the
> list. To act in
> seclusion with something that was previously open to all is not fair
either,
> is it]

I suspect more traffic takes place off list than on LOL! There are many
reasons to take a topic private. One, of course, is that one's post is
relevant *only* to the recipient and not to the list as a whole. ;) Another
is to take a potential acrimonious issue private to protect
others--especially those more sensitive--from unpleasantness of one sort or
another. Still another is the desire to go more deeply into a subject that
has limited interest to others.

> Part of me
> believes that the snipe attack against Jesse was more unfair than Jesse's
> actions.

 Was Angelique's reaction harsh?? I have long since learned not to second
guess her! :)) Of course what was wrong with Jesse's statement IMO, was
perhaps? ;) a certain amount of arrogance--both in thinking he is *above* the
masses, and in his knee jerk reaction to the food issue. But this is exactly
why we seldom mention food here! LOL. It always engenders hostile activity.
 
 
>In any case it would probably depend on the circumstances more than a hard
and
> fast
> rule. Please take time to assess this in your own mind Hillary. Are you
> intentions pure in
> what you are saying? Do you have a one-sidedness in your thinking on this
> topic?

I don't know, do I?! :))

 By
> the way, you're a lovely being! Whether I agree or disagree, I will
always
> respect your
> thoughts. Thanks for posting.

Thank you. :)
>
> Nothing grows in stagnation.
>
> I am posting this in private, but feel free to post to the list.

OK! Here it is.
>
> with peace and love,
> Nick

Love, Hillary

http://www.kundalini-gateway.org

DISCLAIMER!

---

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe

K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.

Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.

All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.

All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©

This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.

URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001b/k200105339.html