To: K-list 
Recieved: 2001/11/06  09:30  
Subject: [K-list] food, masculinity and spirituality 
From: Stephen Kowalchuk
  
On 2001/11/06  09:30, Stephen Kowalchuk posted thus to the K-list: Folks,
 
Please....let's not have a pissing contest over whose diets are best.  As 
individuals we all can tune into what is best for us to eat.  For some, that 
means grains; for others, it's fruit and veggies; for others, it's meat.
 
Anyone who attempts to suggest that all people should unilaterally eat a certain 
diet is ignoring the massive evidence that suggests otherwise.  People from 
Barry Sears to Robert Atkins to Andrew Weil state emphatically that diets are 
individual, and that people still need to eat a variety of foods to be healthy.  
Vegetarians still need proteins, trace minerals and other substances that are 
only found in meats, and people who are vegan often need to supplement.  Again, 
nothing is absolute.  People adapt.
 
As for food and spirituality, I believe some foods can make a person less 
occupied with the physical act of assimilating food and thus more able to focus 
their attention on other things.  And foods affect mood and perception and 
attention and a range of other psychosomatic factors.  This is not spiritual, 
folks, it's biochemical.  Eating a big pile of brown rice with every meal does 
not make me any more spiritual than eating a 12-oz steak.  
 
I know that for my body, foods that are grown organically feel better than foods 
that are full of pesticides and similar stuff.  Spring water feels better than 
city water.  Some of that is perception, and some is biochemistry.  But 
perceptions influence our bodily processes, and our worldview influences our 
health.  So again I say, it's individual.  
 
As for men being less spiritual than women or having less spiritual energy than 
women...what makes one spiritual in nature?  Perhaps there is the ring of truth 
in the statement that stereotypically men are less in touch with their energies 
and more in touch with the physical, "concrete" world.  I know women who are ice 
queens and men who are sissies.  And how does this matter one bit about how 
spiritual they are?
 
I find my balance of masculine and feminine energies to be comfortable.  I can 
be sexually masculine or feminine as my needs dictate.  Being labeled 
spiritually inferior because of my gender arises the same protest that exists 
for people saying that because I am caucasian I am inferior.  Or because I am a 
cancer survivor and I have a few organs missing I am inferior.
 
And I would thank the people who would suggest because I am a caucasian male 
cancer survivor who eats a mostly vegetarian diet that I am inferior to kindly 
shut the fuck up.  I would like to see a little less ego broadcasting and a 
little more spirit.
 
Warmly,
 
Steve
  http://www.kundalini-gateway.org 
  
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001b/k200105328.html
 |