To: K-list 
Recieved: 2001/06/28  09:25  
Subject: [K-list] mitosis... 
From: Nina
  
On 2001/06/28  09:25, Nina posted thus to the K-list: These pieces are ringing my Gemini bells
 lala, fantastymabulous!
 
Twins separated at birth, the vessel cracked. Reunion requires that  
each half be present, not killed or further shattered.
 
Yes, good, no need to kill my ego.
 
Michael submitted: 
> "Your attempts at repressing the ego were actually a running away  
from  
> the ego which not only exacerbated the obsession with the ego, but  
> actually gave body to the conceptual ego. ..... The intellect was  
> brushing off all attempts to pierce its armor. Indeed the intellect  
is  
> itself the armor which the ego wears to ward off all such attempts."
 
CB submitted: 
 THE DIVINE ROMANCE BETWEEN YIN AND YANG
 
Someone once told me that in marriage, "what's mine is mine and  
what's yours is mine."
 
And, the following excerpt  
From:  "Yakov Leib HaKohain [Lawrence G. Corey, Ph.D.]" <amirahATnospame...> 
Date:  Thu Oct 12, 2000  9:58 am 
Subject:  [DONMEH WEST] The Theory & Practice of Dreams & Dreaming:  
Part 5, "Conversing with God" 
To:  "Donmeh West Chaverim" <donmeh_westATnospamegroups.com>
 
Put another way, in sleep the ego returns to its Source, the Self,   
from which it evolved by the process of "spiritual mitosis" I  
described in my earlier lectures of the Jung Seminar. Post-natal  
consciousness dissolves back into pre-natal consciousness: the  
duality of THIS-AND-THAT which characterizes the former state returns  
to the simple THIS-NESS of the latter. Indeed, "God is One, and His  
name is One" and the "shattering of the vessels" that took  place at  
the moment of creation (i.e., birth) is rectified -- but only  
momentarily, because with our return to waking consciousness,  
the "shattering of the vessels" again takes place and the Unity of  
God destroyed yet once again.
 
According to Jung, however, the process of "interpreting" the dream,  
becomes a vehicle for re-establishing a waking dialogue between the  
Self and the personal ego, thereby keeping the "little door" between  
them slightly ajar at all times. In this regard, it is  
not so much the UNDERSTANDING of the dream that matters, but our  
EFFORT to understand  it at all; it is not so much being CORRECT  
about its meaning, but the ATTEMPT to find that meaning in the first  
place that alerts the Self to our readiness to engage it in what Jung  
has called an Auseinandersetzung, or face-to-face "tete-a-tete," only  
after which can we say, with the Biblical Job in the final moments of  
his apotheosis: 
  
"I am the one who obscured [Your] designs [Yahweh] with my empty- 
headed words. I have been holding forth on matters I cannot  
understand, on marvels beyond me and my knowledge . . . . I knew You  
then only by hearsay; but now, having seen You with my own eyes, I  
retract all I have said, and in dust and ashes I repent."  (Job 42:3) 
 
 
  http://www.kundalini-gateway.org 
  
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200103260.html
 |