To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/18 09:09
Subject: FW: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
From: S.G.
On 2001/03/18 09:09, S.G. posted thus to the K-list:
-----Original Message-----
From: S.G. [mailto:pyyemanATnospampyyeman.screaming.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 3:29 PM
To: amusedATnospamptialaska.net
Subject: RE: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
My Dear,
You seemed to have missed the whole point of my message and are more
interested in provoking a reaction from me.
Had you been paying attention you would have gleaned that I was sharing my
uncontrolled spasms of belly thunder at the Fiona thread and our tendency to
take ourselves too seriously! Quite the opposite to your hurried
conclusion. The remark about truth not provoking a response from me was
supposed to be an oxymoron and a comment on the untruthfulness of my own
proposition! Come on in...Sarcasm!
It really must take alot of thought to get something SO wrong! How could you
possibly interpret my post as aggressive is beyond me. I am begining to
think you made me into your bugaboo for the month. All that said I would be
fool to attempt to convince you otherwise after urging the group to accept
and celebrate the flaws in human logic and experience, my own and yours
included.
Well from herein my dear all you will elecit from me is patience and
understanding.
From the heart and the head
Simon
P.S. Can I fight science too or are monsters forced to carry chemistry sets?
-----Original Message-----
From: v [mailto:amusedATnospamptialaska.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 11:54 AM
To: S.G.
Cc: K-list
Subject: Re: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
Simon -
you arte certainly looking for a fight, but about what?
You are TOO serious, eh?
I'm stubborn - I'll fight science! (just for amusement's sake)...
valerie
"S.G." wrote:
> For the group
>
> Just like Mystress, I find these continual hopeless convolutions
(including
> my own) about biological determinism highly amusing (see remarks below).
The
> fact that we are all pressed to reach a consensus of some sort reminds me
> that few of us have truely grown up. Afterall isnt wisdom about discerning
> the differences between things that look alike as opposed to the
> similarities between those that dont. [rhetorical] The fact that the
> universe turns out on enquiry to be unintelligible only serves to fortify
> our ingrained conviction that experience is reality. Remember the universe
> may utlimately prove to be irrational! [something I know many of you
[like
> myself] will avoid dealing with...]
>
> ==============================
>
> Re: Humour. A brush with the numinous sends the ego into the paroxysm we
> call humour...literally a spasm in recognition of the "other" and a
"tragic"
> recognition thereof that its purpose is in its removal. Yes Angelique,
> humour certainly IS the acid test of the truth...but why if that is the
case
> arn't I laughing?!
>
> Sorry to pontificate like that folks, but somebody needed to stir the
> broth...it was going stale!
>
> >From the heart and the head
>
> Simon
>
<>
<
<>
<
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.