To: K-list 
Recieved: 2000/12/31  15:29  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Kundalini - another perspective 
From: Samantha Atkins
  
On 2000/12/31  15:29, Samantha Atkins posted thus to the K-list: 
Christopher Wynter wrote: 
>  
> Some people find truths in what my partner Fiona and I post to this list. 
>  
> Others, react violently ... because what we write does not necessarily fit 
> in with what we have been taught to believe .. either in this lifetime, on 
> the past lives of what some call our soul .. or in the genetic memories 
> of our ancestors carried in our DNA. 
>  
> What I would like to say here is that we already are awakened, 
> experiencing the essence that some call Kundalini .. 
>         we would be very dead if we weren't 
> 
 
Already awakened ones experience no upset if others disagree with their 
words. Awakened ones have no need to convince anyone of anything, they 
only offer to each what each can receive.
 
On some level we are already home, are One with God and perfectly safe.  
The trouble is that for most of us much of our experience of our being 
does not live on that level. Whether this level, whether the separation 
is illusion or not makes little difference while you are still caught up 
within it.
 
Telling the sleeping one, yelling in her ear "Wake UP!  You are not 
ASLEEP!" usually does very little except to annoy all those caught in 
the dream.  
 
God dreams the dream of us dreaming and injects that which will end the 
dream.  There are sudden and gradual endings from the perspective of the 
dreamer.  So what?  Why insist one is so much better than the other?  
Why add to the dream that is already being dreamed an altercation about 
how it should go and how it should end?  Can this be aught but more of 
the dream? To what purpose?
 
All of us are given the tools to awaken.  Some will seem to go more 
quickly than others or more directly.  There are those who say that 
there is no gradual school, that there is only the sudden school but 
some take a lot longer than others to figure this out.  Others will say 
that there is only the gradual school and what looks sudden is the final 
act in a long intricate dance away from and back to the Divine. 
 
It is certainly true enough that at some point the map, the path, all 
the teachings need to be let go of along with the rest.  But it is not 
true 
imho that all souls at all points in their own unfolding should just 
throw 
out all tools from the beginning and take someone on faith that there is  
nowhere to go and nothing to do.  
 
Especially if it is true.  There is much along the way that is perfectly 
true but that at that particular point in the journey is also quite 
irrelevant.
 
OM shanti, 
 
samantha
 1/9699/0/_/680797/_/978301744/ 
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
 
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2000b/k20a05475.html
 |