To: K-list 
Recieved: 2000/06/04  17:36  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Will this do, El? 
From: Lynda
  
On 2000/06/04  17:36, Lynda posted thus to the K-list: 
(((((((Thanks El))))))) 
Good questions are hard to find. (oh - and hard questions are good to 
find!)with love 
Lynda aka as the nutty tart
 
There ae two kinds of truths. There are the superficial truths, the opposite 
of which are obviously wrong. But there are also the profound truths, whose 
opposites are equally right. 
Neils Bohr. 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ckressATnospamaol.com> 
To: <Kundalini-GatewayATnospamegroups.com> 
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 8:30 PM 
Subject: Re: [K-list] Will this do, El?
 
> In a message dated 06/04/2000 5:11:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> pythonissaATnospammadasafish.com writes: 
> 
> << I've been watching a blasted tree. Literally, blasted by the elements. 
A 
> particularly strong blast of wind, perhaps. It was a big tree. Once it 
must 
> have been very tall, reaching for the sky, as a tree should. As is it's 
> nature, throwing up it's branches towards the sun. Did it reach too high? 
Who 
> knows? It was toppled. Did it slowly lean further and further until it 
came 
> to rest? Or did it happen suddenly? One moment upright, the next brought 
low. 
> It's still alive. It was not uprooted. Damaged, but not enough to kill it. 
> It's still growing - sideways. It's trunk now a low arch across the grass 
by 
> the river bank. Two branches now have parts deep in water. Have they 
become 
> like the naturally hidden parts? Have they changed their nature or their 
> function? One branch touches the Earth on the otherside of the river. I 
can 
> see this plainly because spring is late and the leaves too small to 
obscure 
> the shape of the distorted, bent tree. It exists quietly in May sunlight. 
> Frustrated in it's tree nature. As I watch I imagine all the creatures 
that 
> have walked, scampered, crawled, across what to them was a bridge. Did 
they 
> recognise the bridge's fallen treeness? Does the tree grieve that all the 
> effort it put into reaching for the sky is doomed to lie close to the 
Earth? 
> Or, does it realise it's disability to be a tree serves a purpose? Or is 
it 
> just enough that the little piece of conciousness that I carry is aware? 
> Perhaps.>> 
> 
> Thank you for posting this, Lynda.  When something captures our attention 
> like this, it's a "story" that is somehow shared -- it has personal 
> significance to us.  If you enter into it as if you are that tree, can you 
> feel yourself growing "very tall, reaching for the sky" as you "should"? 
Do 
> you feel that you "should" be lofty-minded and have very high aspirations? 
> Or do you criticize yourself for this, and think that you are an overly 
> ambitious tree?  ("Did it reach too high?") 
> 
> Can you feel yourself toppling, still alive but "growing sideways"?  In 
what 
> way does this resemble your life?  How do you feel that your growth has 
taken 
> the wrong direction? 
> 
> Can you feel yourself arching over so that you create a bridge for other 
> beings to cross the river safely?  How are you serving in this way?  How 
have 
> your "distorted, bent" experiences (or the results of those experiences) 
> enabled you to help others make an easier journey?  Do you feel that what 
it 
> has cost you to be able to help others goes unrecognized by them?  ("Did 
they 
> recognize the bridge's fallen treeness?")  Or do you feel others 
overestimate 
> you, not realizing that you are in some way "fallen"? 
> 
> I see three processes going on in the tree story.  One is the tragedy of 
the 
> great tree toppling over, which makes it feel both grief and frustrated in 
> realizing its true nature.   The second process is the service that the 
tree 
> is able to give as a direct result of its fall.  To me, this second 
process 
> has a Boddhisatva tone: one who delays her own liberation to endure a more 
> lowly, "blasted" existence in order to ease passage for the others.  Do 
you 
> know you are that Boddhisatva? 
> 
> The third process is the least conscious (because it has the least 
emphasis 
> in the story).  This is all the creatures walking, crawling and scampering 
> across the tree-bridge.  I see this as your creative ability to turn 
adverse 
> conditions in your life into something meaningful and positive.  This is a 
> process that has just begun to unfold: you are "imagining all the 
creatures" 
> at this point.  Your full creative potential hasn't manifest yet. 
> 
> El 
> 
> 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2000/k20a02841.html
 |