To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/12/13  06:07  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Nadis and that subject still. 
From: Ville Vainio
  
On 1999/12/13  06:07, Ville Vainio posted thus to the K-list: 
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Tony O'Clery wrote:
 
> Talking about neurons etc is a little off base for 
> they belong to the material, albeit fine, world. Nadis 
> are in the subtle body as such. I believe they are
 
Talking about neurons is reasonable until some proof about subtle body 
(which is not a consequence of the physical body) exists. For now, I don't 
see any reason to believe so. Subtle body might serve as an abstraction of 
physical body (ie some things are more practically explained through 
mechanics of subtle body than physical body - much like sociological 
theories work better if we are thinking about people, not molecules that 
constitute a human), but that doesn't say something doesn't exist at the 
deeper level, the physical body.
 
Ville Vainio - vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi    http://www.tp.spt.fi/~vvainio 
 Wild geese have no intention to cast a reflection 
 Water has no mind to assume their form
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b03626.html
 |