To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/11/16  18:28  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Shaktipat? 
From: Jenell
  
On 1999/11/16  18:28, Jenell posted thus to the K-list: 
Ville Vainio wrote: 
>  
> 
> Hmm... here is my model for shaktipat (Ville moving to his 
> not-so-pompous-but-tediously-systematic form of presentation): 
>  
> Shaktipat is an experience in the family of spiritual experiences, lasting 
> less that 24 hours. 
>  
then many of these would 'fit' that. But the 'secondary' effects, I 
guess you would call them, just the erson's having exerieinced it, 
itself, seems to have profound effects, especially in their belief 
systems as toward spiritual energies, for example. They can never again 
be where they were before it happened. 
 
> The experience of shaktipat can lead to awakening of kundalini in 
> suspectible individuals, just like various mind-control techniques. 
>  
> Xians are "shielded" against shaktipat-induced kundalini through some 
> neurochemical mechanism, which is why they only experience the rush, after 
> which their experience terminates naturally. 
 
No. There are many chrsitians awakening, though it often means their 
leaving that religion, or at least tradition forms of it. Have you read 
'Kundalini energy and christian spirituality', by Philip St. Romain? And 
in reading the works of Christian mystics, it is pretty evident they 
were k awakened.
 
Hence the Toronto-blessing 
> and pentecostalism. I have read some reports, and none of them indicates 
> that k had awakened through their experiences.
 
I don't know, I've no contact with those people. But if any DO awaken it 
might seem likely they quietly leave that religious form, as noted 
above. Also most reports from within those religious circles themsleves 
don't even know what k is and wouldn't admit it as that, anyway. I HAVE 
heard some of the results, effects, are 'life transforming', that sounds 
suspiciously like k might be involved in some cases to me. Of course, 
the promoters are only going to talk about that consistent with the 
beleif system involved. BTW, I am christian, and quite fully awakened. 
Though can no longer at all relate myself to traditional christianity. 
 
>  
> Does this make any sense? I have not experienced anything in the 
> shaktipat-family of experiences, but am interested in it anyway (nice 
> topic to discuss with xians).
 
Just change the words. Call it 'Holy Ghost'. Some of them will eagerly 
chatter right along with you about k related expereinces! As to the 
energy of the Goddess, christinaity has done a real job of burying the 
fact that 'Skekinah', the name in ancient Judaism for the Holy spirit, 
as it appeared as cloud or mist over the mercy seat of their ark of the 
covenent, is a FEMININE form word, the Holy Spirit was considered 
feminine in that culture. 
 
>  
> > > - Were the recipients "spiritual" people? 
> > 
> > I'd say yes, though not all really are 'into' any thought of being 
> > particluarly so. But yes, most are what I'd feel are spiritually 
> > oritented people, and somewhat open with their minds and emotions, in 
> > touch with themselves. 
>  
> Spiritual people in touch with themselves? Isn't that an oxymoron? (joke) 
>  
Maybe we are using words differently. Spiritual people ARE those really 
in touch with themselves. 
 
> Going specific about this pentecostal/shaktipat-experience might be 
> interesting to wider audience, especially the large group of xians who 
> hang out at places where they "receive" the Spirit (40%-alc. vol). Letting 
> them know that what they experience is not from some creature on the cloud 
> might help them search for explanations... spirituality should be 
> trans-intellectual, not anti-intellectual. 
>  
I'm considering it. The above mentioned book, by Philip St romain, is 
publshed by a major Christian press, sold out of print fast, is the only 
contemporay work i know making that connection. In it, he ties k to both 
ancient mystics such as St John of the Cross, and modern pentacostalism. 
The difficulty I have with pentacostalism isn't their spiritual 
practices, it's their judgemental, exclusionary dogmas, a lot of 
outright superstitious nonsense among many of them.  
Jenell
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b02705.html
 |