To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/10/05  11:31  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Consciousness 
From: Ville Vainio
  
On 1999/10/05  11:31, Ville Vainio posted thus to the K-list: 
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Thompson wrote:
 
> >Experiences as an abstraction seem to happen. That doesn't suggest they 
> >are anything special, or essentially different from other things. I might 
> >throw the old All is One-cliche here.
 
> You don't like this specialness idea. Well, I'm not sure that I see 
> consciousness as anything special anyway, except that I want to know how 
> it works, or at least, how it *can* work, since my concepts of matter 
> and energy don't seem to allow for such a phenomenon. Life, I can
 
Ego creates just this "wall" that prevents you from integrating the 
consciousness with your concepts of matter and energy (which I assume to 
be in essence similar to my concepts of those things).
 
> >> I don't think so... Just what has ego to do with it? Are you saying that 
> >> someone without a personal history in their mind cannot experience? 
> > 
> >Ego is not personal history. Ego is the motor that makes consciousness 
> >seem special. (respectively, spiritual ego makes higher state of 
> >consciousness seem special). This is a matter of definition of words, 
> >which is unproductive, though.
 
> How does ego make consciousness seem special?
 
Objectively: a creature functions better when it gives itself (and 
consciousness) a "special" value, something that helps it seperate itself 
from the things he is observing "objectively". Surely he can't be similar 
to those things (he sees their apparent simpilicity as an enslaving 
property). Ego is the thing that does just this trick. Also, ego gives one 
values to live by, reason for existence (even though the person may claim 
to be nihilistic), and gives a nice warm feeling of "me". Ego also 
insulates us from the objective reality, it "abstracts" all the complex 
things that are contained in this body to simple "me". This abstraction is 
not logical, therefore it must appear to be "natural" and "obvious" in 
order to survive our reasoning. And that makes it appear "special", and I 
assume this was the problem you were struggling with. Ego casts a shadow 
of doubt on the logical chain that would be quite obvious without the 
interference from ego.
 
(Excuse any possible incoherence in my verbalization, I'm feeling a bit 
lightheaded at the moment... did lots of yoga yesterday)
 
Ville Vainio - vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi    http://www.tp.spt.fi/~vvainio 
 We're all puppets 
 The first step on the path to understanding is seeing the strings
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01985.html
 |