To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/30 05:35
Subject: BOUNCE kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net: Non-member submission from
From: Owner-Kundalini
On 1999/09/30 05:35, Owner-Kundalini posted thus to the K-list:
>From K-listATnospamdomin8rex.com Thu Sep 30 06:35:11 1999
Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id GAA06123; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 06:35:11 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: salmon.esosoft.net: Host [194.200.20.13] claimed to be mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk
Received: from useraw68.netscapeonline.co.uk ([62.124.17.215] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk)
by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
id 11WfQW-0001l1-00
for kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 12:35:12 +0000
Message-ID: <37F33DCB.93AEAA32ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:39:07 +0100
From: lobsteredjason1 <lobsteredjason1ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
Reply-To: arcATnospaminame.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en,en-*
To: kundalini-list <kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
Subject: Re: [K-list] INTENT
References: <00ba01bf0b15$1f6fc2a0$ccdc4018ATnospam29059120966.gvcl1.bc.wave.home.com> <37F33D68.71023FD8ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
lobsteredjason1 wrote:
> Wim Borsboom wrote:
>
> > >A LOVING PERSON LIVES IN A LOVING WORLD
> > >A HOSTILE PERSON LIVES IN A HOSTILE WORLD
> > >EVERYONE YOU MEET IS YOUR MIRROR...
> >
> > Dear Skypod Moonbeam,
> >
> > You know, the above is recent, new-age gobbledegook.
>
> Dear Friend,
> Is it? Perhaps you have not reflected deeply enough? :-)
>
> > This gobbledegook can make you laugh nervously.
>
> Can it. What else might it produce?
>
> > This gobbledegook can make you powerless.
> > This gobbledegook can not set you free.
>
> ;-)
> What would you recommend?
>
> > It is the current 'nouveau morality' of self-punishment.
> > As guilt-ridden and judgement-driven as some old age religions.
>
> Is it? What world do you illustrate?
>
> > What you see in a mirror is a reflection, it is not you.
>
> No?
> What is experienced as seeing is not seen by you either perhaps?
>
> > How you interpret that reflection is a reflection of how you were judged.
>
> Do you judge or interpret what you say as being correct? Is that of any
> greater relevance? To whom?
>
> > The statement " EVERYONE YOU MEET IS YOUR MIRROR..."
> > is flawed logic, lacks philosophical depth and is scientifically unsound.
>
> Flawed logic, lack of philosophical depth and an unscientific approach
> work
> for me.
> Not in your reflective judgement?
>
> > Above all, it lacks compassion towards one-self and fellow human beings.
> > Do not trip over this mirror metaphor.
>
> What is the nature of your compassion and trip?
>
> > Please, do not be unduly shocked.
> > I tend to talk this way.
>
> Why?
> Do you have a tendency or wish to 'unduly shock'.
>
> > See if you can figure it out.
>
> Figure? Is there something to figure out? Something to reflect on? Seems
> transparent to me . . .
>
> Be Well
> Lobster talk
>
> PS
> Hi Kundalites . . .
>
> "Sayings do not correspond to potential. Words do not set forth
> actualities. Those who accept words perish. Those who linger over
> sayings get lost. When you have caught the fish, you forget the trap.
> When you
> have gotten the meaning of the words, you forget the words. We use a
> net to
> catch fish; the fish are not the net." -- Ku-shan
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.