To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/28 15:34
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
From: Mail Delivery System
On 1999/09/28 15:34, Mail Delivery System posted thus to the K-list:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
lsiATnospamvandra.clara.net:
Child process of local_delivery transport returned 67 (could mean user nonexistent) from command:
/usr/local/bin/claradeliver
The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:
------ lsiATnospamvandra.clara.net ------
claradeliver: Sorry, but this is not a valid customer.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
Received: from [192.41.17.47] (helo=salmon.esosoft.net ident=salmon)
by nemesis.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 11W5pY-00072b-00
for lsiATnospamvandra.clara.net; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:34:40 +0100
Received: from localhost (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id QAA00256; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:33:10 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by salmon.esosoft.net (bulk_mailer v1.9); Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:26:38 -0600
Received: (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id QAA29036; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:26:35 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from imo17.mx.aol.com (imo17.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.7]) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id QAA28839; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:25:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
Received: from KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
by imo17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id tSCOa11143 (4247)
for <kundaliniATnospamlist-server.net>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 18:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3bc95fa4.25229a27ATnospamaol.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 18:24:39 EDT
Subject: [K-list] Lack of cessation
To: kundaliniATnospamlist-server.net
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 41
Sender: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
Reply-To: KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
In a message dated 9/27/99 2:19:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
aurasphereATnospamhome.com writes:
<< If the deceased..., (My god, what a word! I hope 'they' are not listening
and passing judgement on me :-) >>
If the dead are "de-ceased" does that make the living "ceased"?
LOL
James
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.