To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/09/24  07:35  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Enlightened Love 
From: Blackswan
  
On 1999/09/24  07:35, Blackswan posted thus to the K-list: 
El:
 
Wow. Thanks for your reply. I really got that you heard and 
interacted -- responded -- with what I wanted to communicate.
 
You were so personal and vulnerably authentic (all ingredient 
for real love by the way!) that I am moved with affinity and 
compassion.
 
Yes. Love is not a concept. Not only a feeling. Not only nice 
intentions. Not a creed to subscribe to. Not a code to which to 
adhere. Not a duty to get handled. Not something contained by 
"mind." So, yes, maybe what I wrote is an example of my mind 
trying to "figure out" love. But rather than embracing something 
out of the capacity of mind, I do want to communicate -- to 
transpersonalize? to transmute? to conduct (as a conduit)? love, 
not as a mind thing, but as a personal intimate relationship. 
And by "person" I do not mean human being -- I mean the person 
of God -- knowing God as a person. Not a person just like me or 
that I am god, but to point ( yes, with my mind and these mere 
words) to love experientially known, not with the mind, but know 
in the context of being - to - being relationship.
 
This knowing of which I point is not knowing about. It is not 
knowing facts or information but knowing through our entire 
being however we conceive of "entire being". This "knowing" is a 
certainty. Not a mind certainty like something of which you have 
convinced yourself and others agree upon life 2 plus 2 equals 4. 
But knowing like the Hebrew word to know which is to have 
intimate exchange. To know God intimately like a wife could be 
said to know her husband in the moment of sexual intercourse. To 
get what I mean by "know" is to understand the fulness of the 
Hebrew word translated into english as "know" which goes way 
beyond a mind thing.
 
Yes, this love is not something for the mind to grasp and get 
"handled". But nor is it merely and energetic exchange either. 
There is still something more. It is more than a physical object 
of course: a rose can be an expression of love, but it in and of 
itself is not love. A rose could be (to the way I am speaking of 
it) a "conduit" of love in that it is used to convey love.
 
But I assert that with these mystical experiences, we tend to 
try to make energies into objects as well. I am saying that even 
these energetic "things" are closer perhaps to love, but still 
are not love and that if the best you can do is see and absorb 
energetic "things" of love energy then you are still in the 
shallow end of the pool. Not that you're bad; just that there is 
SO much more possible. I simply do not want the conduit of love, 
be that a rose, a beam of light-- whatever to be confused with 
love itself because I assert that love is the person of God who 
is the source of all those expressions. I am concerned what we 
will love the EXPRESSION of love, mistaking it for the fullness 
of love, and never move on to the fullest enjoyment of the 
lover. We might explore and enjoy the love letter, but not move 
beyond that _expression_ of love to partake of the lover whose 
wrote those letters. In this analogy, the lights and energies 
are the expression -- the letter. Just press on to the source: 
the lover behind the love. That's the core I what I really want 
myself and am trying to use these words to convey a simply 
glimpse of.
 
This is, of course, something words and metaphors fall short of 
when compared to the face-to-face experience. Words of love are 
not love, and you're right that words alone will, finally, still 
leave us hungry. Only love is love. I simply assert that love is 
a person and that person is God. The details are a mystery which 
allows for a degree of flexibility in the expression of this 
relationship. But finally, only knowing love without distortion 
is possible only inasmuch as we know God and enjoy intimacy with 
God. I surely have way more to go in that, but that's what 
eternity if for :)
 
--black swan
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01740.html
 |