To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/09/14  01:01  
Subject: Re: Survival of fittest (was Re: [K-list] Reactions from the in 
From: Martin Thompson
  
On 1999/09/14  01:01, Martin Thompson posted thus to the K-list: 
14:54:02 Mon, 13 Sep 1999 
Roger Bose at Roger Bose <bose_45ATnospamhotmail.com> writes: 
> 
> 
> 
>>From: Ville Vainio <vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi> 
>>Reply-To: Ville Vainio <vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi> 
>>To: Kundalini <kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net> 
>>Subject: Survival of fittest (was Re: [K-list] Reactions from the inner 2  
>>yo. ... Melissa 
>>Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:08:20 +0300 (EET DST) 
>> 
>>On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Martin Thompson wrote: 
>> 
>> > respectfulness is obvious, but the need for realism perhaps less so. I 
>> > think that this Universe operates using a system of survival of the 
>> > fittest, and realism is therefore implicitly demanded by that goal. To 
> 
>What about compassion? 
> 
I wouldn't say that compassion is unrealistic. I think that a genuine 
appreciation of the way the world works would include such attitudes. 
After all, from an evolutionary standpoint, I doubt that we would have 
the capacity for compassion if it didn't work all that well.
 
But anyway, this is an example of what I mean. When I wrote my 
statement, I wasn't thinking of things like compassion - yet someone 
else has added another dimension to the discussion. This is an example 
of why we need to respect other people's views and avoid dogmatism and 
dogmatic writing, in my opinion.
 
>We have enough food to feed the world. With our present technology if used  
>properly by enlightened minds, I do not think the majority of us would need  
>to work as slaves for a living doing what we don't really want to do.  Our  
>time could be used to study and teach future generations.  Again, I feel  
>that this is the result of Un-creative thinking.  What I'm suggesting is a  
>synthesis of the archaic enthogen using tribal system with our own system.   
>Some how gel the two together.  I think we could be living in a paradise. 
> 
Now, this *might* be unrealistic utopianism! Having said that, I suspect 
that social evolution towards a better society is in fact happening, 
facilitated by technology. The problem with it is that, as it seems to 
me, social evolution or the state of society seems to be largely 
determined by the state of the lowest common denominator. As we help the 
worst scumbags in our world to develop their compassion, so we are.
 
><http://deoxy.org/deoxyf.htm> 
>
 
--  
Martin Thompson         martinATnospamtucana.demon.co.uk 
London, UK       
   Home Page:   http://www.tucana.demon.co.uk 
 Free Regular Income:   http://www.virtualis.com/vr/mthomps4/vrp.html
 
"Everything I do and say with anyone makes a difference." Gita Bellin
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01389.html
 |