To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/09/01  15:57  
Subject: Re: [K-list] Blockages, Anger 
From: alingimp
  
On 1999/09/01  15:57, alingimp posted thus to the K-list: 
Karin wrote: 
>>Anger can be a blinding force and one could find oneself doing or saying 
things 
>>that can be hurtful to others which one wouldn't have done or said 
>>otherwise. Isn't acting out on anger losing control over oneself?
 
Angelique wrote: 
>    Can you be angry without losing control? Try looking for the caring in 
>it. It is passionate. Everything has it's duality, even anger. Sometimes I 
>get angry and when I look into it, it is just Goddess getting me to pay 
>attention to what I love, and when I understand that I can shape the anger 
>into something beneficial 
Yes, I can be angry without losing control, I try not to let the anger get 
hold on me. I think that most of the time when someone gets angry, it's just 
because their ego is hurt. We get angry when we can't get the candy we want 
or when someone is being unfriendly towards us or when the computer breaks 
down etc. Sure, there can be care in it, too. I remember an episode when my 
parents came to visit from Europe 3 years ago and at the office where 
visitors of Canada can claim the GST (General Sales Tax) back, the girl 
behind the counter gave my dad a hard time and was being rude and 
disrespectful to him, as well as taking advantage of the fact that english 
isn't his first language. I have to admit that I lost it there and lashed 
out at her in full force, even had her call the manager and let her know too 
what I think of their service (of course my dad did get his GST back in the 
end) .
 
Karin wrote: 
>>  I mean, if 
>>I could be above being angry and don't let myself down to the same level 
in 
>>an instance of provocation, I would win the encounter, simply because I 
can 
>>stay in control. 
Angelique wrote: 
>   Well, if you were depressed into catalepsy, then you would always win, 
>by those standards, coz you wouldn't care enough about anything to get 
>angry. You would not be affecting the world enough for anyone to get angry 
>at you. 
Not getting provoked easily isn't the same as getting depressed into 
catalepsy to me, I just think we should look at things within their 
proportions. As a store owner, people are rude and unfriendly to me on a 
daily basis. Where would I be if I would let them bother me? I look at it 
this way: If they are having a bad day, or generally have a bad attitude, it 
should be their problem and not mine.
 
Angelique wrote: 
>  Christ and the temple traders, enlightened folks still carry the full 
>compliment of emotions, they just get mad about different stuff, and handle 
>it differently. I think it was Yogi Muktananda who was notorious for having 
>a sharp tongue and plentiful use of the Master's cane on his students. 
>Gandhi organized his anger at the British exploitation of India, into a 
>massive sit down strike of the entire country... he pissed off the British 
>Empire real good! 
That's anger on a different level, removed from any pettishness. The 
question is: How to distinguish between righteous anger and petty anger, 
when it comes to ourselves? I dare say, most of the times when someone gets 
angry, it is the pettish kind, just a lot of hot air blowing. 
> 
Angeliqe wrote: 
Look at great leaders, and you will find most often, 
>that their original motivation to get them up off their butts, was anger. 
>>  Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, .. labor unions, the human rights 
>movement, the Vietnam protesters.. Righteous anger, that sometimes goes 
>beyond this lifetime.. 
Isn't the ultimate motivation of these people compassion in the end? I mean, 
it's easy to be angry and in your anger to be (self)destructive but in the 
end I believe it has to be transformed to be useful, as people like Martin 
Luther King whom you mentioned, prove. He was way above the rest of 
thousands of angry protestors because I believe, his ultimate motivation was 
love and not anger. Back in France in 1789, anger was the main motivation 
too and look where it got them in the end. To cite Danton: " The revolution 
is eating it's own children". The element of love or compassion went missing 
altogether. 
Love, 
Karin
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b00974.html
 |