To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/06/29  08:35  
Subject: Fwd: [K-list] Not really K?/was Gender 
From: Druout
  
On 1999/06/29  08:35, Druout posted thus to the K-list: 
Dear List,
 
Jenell meant this for the list, also.
 
Love, Hillary 
Return-Path: <anglfthrATnospamiamerica.net> 
Received: from  rly-zb03.mx.aol.com (rly-zb03.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.3]) by 
 air-zb05.mail.aol.com (v59.51) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:35:41 
 -0400 
Received: from  relay.interim.iamworld.net (relay.interim.iamworld.net 
 [204.91.241.82]) by rly-zb03.mx.aol.com (vx) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 
 1999 20:35:15 -0400 
Received: from iamerica.net (1Cust217.tnt4.hou3.da.uu.net [208.254.104.217]) 
 by relay.interim.iamworld.net (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA320536 
 for <DruoutATnospamaol.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:35:13 -0400 (EDT) 
Message-ID: <37722E3A.467CF8E8ATnospamiamerica.net> 
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:10:18 -0500 
From: Jenell <anglfthrATnospamiamerica.net> 
Organization: I ain't organized! 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) 
 
To: DruoutATnospamAOL.COM 
Subject: Re: [K-list] Not really K?/was Gender 
References: <f4e420a3.24a95b69ATnospamaol.com> 
 
DruoutATnospamaol.com wrote: 
>  
> Dear Jenell, 
>  
> It's odd, and in retrospect rather amazing (or naive?), but in the 1 1/2 
> years I've been on the K list, I feel that every one of those who have shared 
> their experiences here have *really* experienced the sexual energy of 
> Kundalini.  
 
(J) There seems to be some misunderstanding. i didn't mean anyone didn't 
expereience the sexual energy aspects, it seems to be a very basic part 
of it. But not neccessarily all have the same kinds of expereiences, 
sexaul or otherwise. but it's difficult for me to comprehend having k 
expereiences to any strong degree without also some negative, difficult 
aspects. This not only in my own, but in connection to having been 
active as a support person for people with k awakenings through 
spiritual group that does k counseling. Some of the things people 
expereience are hair raising, to say the least. I had prepared another 
post, in reply to Collette, but the way this list works, i goofed and 
sent it only to her. Have asked her to forward it the list for me. in 
it, I explain further some of the more traumatic expereiences some have. 
And this, being traumtic, is not merely becasue of people having 
different persepcitve on what is happening to them. They are things 
downright awful to expereience, for anyone.
 
What i was referring to in my wondering was the all bliss and fun and 
lightness, with no or little mention of anything difficult. and as I 
noted, no one can judge another's expereince, theirs may be 'real', but 
I do also know that until one HAS expereienced it, it can be difficult 
for them to KNOW they haven't, easily mistake other things for it. My 
'warning' was toward anyone attempting to force an awakening they may 
not be prepared for. It doesn't go easy for everyone. for some, there 
are some really wild trips involved!
 
I think people's reactions vary incredibly, depending on 
> background, age, physical condition, the ability to process metaphor, etc. 
> Perhaps you feel that only those whose lives have been torn to shreds have 
> experienced the real thing.  Or perhaps you feel it cannot be a totally 
> positive experience.  (?)
 
(J) that may be so, some having a totally postive expereience. but one 
cannot know, or anticipate that before hand. Also, once the k starts 
doing it' thing, it can become, often very suddenly, full time, full 
power, with NO 'off switch', as it has been for me for 4 yrs now. I mean 
NO OFF SWITCH. Since the very sudden blow open 4 yrs ago, I've not had a 
moment without it. and some of the manifestations I expereince is 
constant, very sensitive telempathy, sporadic telepathy, both with ALL 
others, not just others with k, clairvoyance/clairaudience, etc. The 
telepathy is interconnected to both 'blessing' and things i could do 
with out. healing gift, developing strongly and rapidly, I'm now working 
both alone and with a larger healing group, but also sexual 
manifestations i don't initiate, comes at inconvenenet times, at best 
distracting, at wore, some has been very forceful, violent, accompanied 
with some very ugly thought and emotion from the 'sender' through the 
telepathy. Theres' nothing about my 'persepcitive' that makes THAT a 
positve or negative thing!
 
>  
> One thing is certain, though, I certainly agree that it is a power not to be 
> called up on a whim.  It's a life changing phenomena, and to try to "control" 
> the energy is to do so at one's own risk. 
>  
> Love, Hillary 
>  
>
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999/k9901867.html
 |