To: K-list 
Recieved: 1999/03/10  17:43  
Subject: [K-list] Apology for my remarks 
From: Llewellyn
  
On 1999/03/10  17:43, Llewellyn posted thus to the K-list: 
Dear Connie, and list,
 
 Glad to see you stayed on the list - it is a dynamic growth tool (at least 
in my opinion).
 
> I liked the Eastenders too when I could get them,
 
 This list, lately, has seemed like a soap opera and yes also cartoonish. 
But then cartoons are great fun and although I do not like U.S. soaps, the 
Eastenders has me hooked.
 
>  You can state 
> >whatever you want, as your opinion, or your point of view - but, when you 
> >take on that holier than thou attitude - then I object. 
> 
> I don't hear the holier than thou attitude you write of regarding Cathy's 
> posting(s).  I hear an individual's perspective.  I am on this 
> list to hear 
> the different views and experiences.
 
I suppose we each hear different aspects of anyone's posts and we of 
necessity run that through our filter functions.  I have tried to comment 
about this aspect to the list and it does cause many over reactions. 
Sometimes though, we just naturally react to certain vibrations that come 
through in a message, just like we naturally react around some people in 
person.  I was frankly insulted and annoyed by Cathy's post.  It did not 
seem to me to be moderated with any "from my view point - this is how it 
seems" rather it seemed to me to be a statement that claimed to know the 
more enlightened understanding period.  I appreciate everyone's special 
connection to the source - but just as I do not suggest that my 
understanding is for anyone other than me, i also do not necessarily buy 
into another's understanding until that is verified by my soul and 
incorporated into my essence.  I was annoyed - but you are right, I should 
have kept quiet - and i am sure that my posts annoy people - especially 
since (in the past) I have received anonymous mail telling me to unsubscribe 
from this list.
 
> 
>  A while ago, when someone on this list was saying they believed 
> some women 
> (people) "asked" to be abused, my anger switch tripped and I was all over 
> this person with a rude, labeling attitude, because his comment 
> hit close to 
> home.   Further, I was hurt and wanted to get off the list right 
> away when I 
> received a wrist slapping from Angelique for unleashing my anger here. 
> These incidents increased my awareness of some things about myself that 
> could easily continue to trip me up for a longer time.  (Rightous victim's 
> anger and my need for approval
 
Well, to me your reaction was natural and not that bad - to me it is an 
issue of balance, to achieve balance it is often necessary to tip in the 
opposite direction for awhile -  your statement of chew it up and spit it 
out - to me was not the same as spit at someone, the later being rude the 
former just a strong statement that you were not buying any crap from anyone 
and would defend yourself.  But again people hear what they want to hear and 
pick out the parts of posts that seem significant to them - we are all 
imperfect filters - which is why communication can be so difficult at times. 
You also were slapped for not snipping the post that you were commenting 
about (I believe) :).
 
> 
> Llewellyn, I know that you had your fill (understatement) of religion from 
> others in your past.  You are probably more capable that a lot of 
> people to 
> know what a purely objective spiritual deliberation is.
 
hmm, not sure if I would recognize a purely objective spiritual 
deliberation - these words do not compute for me - to me spirituality is 
subjective, that is, it is personal and part of the subject and can not be 
separated from that person - the task of knowing oneself, to search within 
oneself is to make a spirituality that is yours and not others (IMO). 
'Deliberation' seems strange as well.  Juries go through  a deliberation 
process to reach a verdict - spiritual decisions are reached by an 
inspiration or a vision or an ah ha moment and then contemplated over to see 
if that fits into one's wider understanding.  'Purely', in context with 
spiritual is also strange to me, perhaps spiritual is a part of a mixture  - 
(do not know how to explain this - the thought is not clear in my mind)
 
About religion - I tend to be hypersensitive to that word - I suppose my 
view on this is similar to Lao Tzu's - "when they lose their sense of awe 
people turn to religion" - But yet from the little that i have gleaned from 
posts, I understand that Cathy has a more personal and more Essene 
"original" perspective of what that person called Jesus taught.  I should 
not have allowed my prejudices to color my words.  And I really do not 
understand what her perspective is, so I apologize.
 
> I don't want to run 
> over people when they express there point of view anymore.  I want to be 
> objective in how I receive what they write.  I guess that has to come from 
> the inside out.
 
I probably disagree with you slightly here.  I believe one should maintain 
one's personal, subjective, perspective whether it is anger, annoyance etc. 
But yes it is better to just recognize that, and say wow this is really 
making me annoyed. After registering that feeling tnen say, hmm what is up 
with this.  I think that all emotions are okay - anger is good etc..  How we 
deal with that emotion is the question.  And perhaps expressing those 
emotions in a reasonable manner is part of the growth process - perhaps 
along the lines of being assertive, without aggressive or insulting.
 
> 
> I think it is interesting what makes each of us angry.
 
Yes, we all seem to have those buttons that can be pushed - but then I was 
thinking about how we are really working on helping each other remove chakra 
blockages so the k force can flow more easily.  And rereading Magne Aga's 
post about how we develop these 'self protecting' mechanisms that end up 
hindering our growth - this list allows us to explore these blockages and 
helps to unravel them - and the issue of abuse and our method of interacting 
with the universe with this filter in place is perhaps critical to 
understand so we can dissolve that blockage.
 
sorry if I lost my cool and apologies to all, 
Llewellyn
 
 
 
 Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given).  Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses. 
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the   symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©  
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999/k9900879.html
 |