Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/02/13 14:12
Subject: RE: [K-list] "understandings"
From: Llewellyn


On 1999/02/13 14:12, Llewellyn posted thus to the K-list:

 IN response to my post about "understandings" Hillary asks:

> Are these the "understandings" that come to you out of your K
> experiences or
> "Intellectual" understandings that you formulate after the fact?
> Which are
> which??? :))
>
> Love, Hillary

Hillary and list;

 Regarding my list of 'understandings' - are these just products of my
meager intellect - I do not know - if they ring true; then so be it, if
they seem like garbage, then so be it - I was only trying to add what seem
like understandings to me - Not all occurred during high k - number 1 was a
big deal to me during my k awakening as was 1b. I suppose all of them at
least partially represent where I am at, right now - and are not
inconsistent in any great extent from any "understandings" I felt when I was
vibrating the most. (if that is a reasonable way to phrase that)- Should I
hide in shame for daring to say such blasphemy?

  I suppose these can be considered just products of the intellect if one
wants; - to me in that state we tap into larger reservoirs of thought -
however, that doesn't necessary mean that it is valid or invalid - just like
channeled material, everything must be carefully evaluated. - And as I
suggest everything written in any book or in any form whatsoever must be
passed through a sieve a questioning phase - Is this right? (unless - you
have the magic decoder and can pick out the "Simon says - " encrypted within
the message. Everybody must weigh the thoughts in their own consciousness
to feel if it seems right, does it ring true to them. This seemed like a
Truth to me at the time and still does - sorry. - At least that is the way
it seems to me - that is my understanding and My understanding says
question - especially question anybody who says "I understand
......................" - so certainly question this ---- and any place
where I do not add adequate caveats around my words.

 And sometimes I play the devil's advocate - rarely do I directly indicate
"Simon says". Just kidding - - oh to be a kid again.

 more than enough said by me on this: and i thought that I was adding some
balance - so much for the teeter-totter - so much for thought <<|>>
Llewellyn.

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999/k9900577.html