To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/01/07 12:32
Subject: [Fwd: [K-list] New twin soul mailing list]
From: nancy
On 1999/01/07 12:32, nancy posted thus to the K-list:
Received: from lix.intercom.es (rootATnospamlix.intercom.es [194.179.21.2])
by wtpprod1.wtp.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA25184
for <nancyATnospamwtp.net>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 23:43:52 -0700 (MST)
Received: from jb (iv3-115.intercom.es [195.76.131.115]) by lix.intercom.es (8.7.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA31440 for <nancyATnospamwtp.net>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 07:41:10 +0100
From: "jb" <kvy9ATnospamlix.intercom.es>
To: <nancyATnospamwtp.net>
Subject: RE: [K-list] New twin soul mailing list
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 06:43:45 -0000
Message-ID: <000e01be3a09$12f95780$73834cc3ATnospamjb>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
In-Reply-To: <3693F139.FB21C024ATnospamwtp.net>
The mystical union equals nirvana. It seems to be a union but in reality
self is annihilated. The union is existing already but we are born ignorant
of it. So the allegories are pointing to a state of happiness that mortals
can understand. The happiness of nirvana exceeds everything else; all
problems of life are solved for ever.
I forgot to reply to the list; corrected it but this reply is to just you;
don't mind if you take it to list.
Jan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nancy [mailto:nancyATnospamwtp.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 1999 23:27
> To: jb
> Subject: Re: [K-list] New twin soul mailing list
>
>
> > Jan: To my knowledge, stories about hermaphrodites are
> allegories to convey
> > the impossible, the bliss of the mystical union (moksha,
> nirvana). Because
> > this union isn't attained in the proper sense (what is attained will be
> > lost), the stories tell of a blissful state that has existed
> but was lost.
> > Loosing because of one's incarnation and the conditioning that
> goes with it.
> > So one has to go the reverse way in order to "restore" this
> blissful state.
>
> I don't understand what you mean. You say the stories convey the
> impossible
> because the union isn't attained in the proper sense. I think I'm
> missing a few
> points. What do you mean by the mystical union? And why is it
> impossible to
> attain? And why do the allegories point this out?
>
>
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.