1997/12/29 10:04
kundalini-l-d Digest V97 #867
kundalini-l-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 867
Today's Topics:
Re: Danger Will Robinson? [ Delirium <deliriumATnospamfull-moon.com> ]
Re: Danger Will Robinson? [ Tantrika <hummer13ATnospamearthlink.net> ]
Re: Book of Psalms [ Bohemial <BohemialATnospamaol.com> ]
Re: ReGuys ??Gays [ Lorianna Burkes <lady_enchantmentATnospamy ]
Psalms/update [ GSDonne <gsdonneATnospamiinet.net.au> ]
Private? [ Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic ]
Re: Private? Keep private [ ori <oriATnospameskimo.com> ]
Question [ Bacchus976 <Bacchus976ATnospamaol.com> ]
Re: Gays [ Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic ]
Re: Private? Keep private [ Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic ]
Re: [Fwd: Proof] [ mraft <at3ATnospamearthlink.net> ]
Re: Private? Keep private [ Nancy <NancyATnospamwtp.net> ]
Re: Private? Keep private [ Qwartz <QwartzATnospamaol.com> ]
List Archives [ ori <oriATnospameskimo.com> ]
Science [ Gene Kieffer <gkiefferATnospamnetaxis.com> ]
Institutions [ Gene Kieffer <gkiefferATnospamnetaxis.com> ]
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 17:52:04 +0000
From: Delirium <deliriumATnospamfull-moon.com>
To: Tantrika <hummer13ATnospamearthlink.net>, Kundalini-l <Kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: Danger Will Robinson?
Message-ID: <34A691C0.592A5F55ATnospamfull-moon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
A late note...
After my second intense transcendental (or whatever <g>) experience
today...coincidentally another Sunday for what it's worth (the first was
the Sunday before U.S. Thanksgiving)...I'm inclined to say that you
already *have* a guide if you have dedicated yourself to the Goddess...
That's all the wisdom I can share for right now.
Another newbie--Delirium (Kath)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 16:15:16 -0800
From: Tantrika <hummer13ATnospamearthlink.net>
To: deliriumATnospamionet.net, Tantrika <hummer13ATnospamearthlink.net>,
Kundalini-l <Kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: Danger Will Robinson?
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971228160234.007dc920ATnospamearthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thank you Delirium, tell me (us) what happened?
At 05:52 PM 12/28/97 +0000, Delirium wrote:
>A late note...
>
>After my second intense transcendental (or whatever <g>) experience
>today...coincidentally another Sunday for what it's worth (the first was
>the Sunday before U.S. Thanksgiving)...I'm inclined to say that you
>already *have* a guide if you have dedicated yourself to the Goddess...
>
>That's all the wisdom I can share for right now.
>
>Another newbie--Delirium (Kath)
>
>
>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 20:11:20 EST
From: Bohemial <BohemialATnospamaol.com>
To: iriATnospamivyrealty.com, kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Cc: BohemialATnospamaol.com
Subject: Re: Book of Psalms
Message-ID: <ba5aba8f.34a6f8bbATnospamaol.com>
hello all,
I consider myself a bit of a futurist, but try to pull predictions out of the
Bible
and placing them in current time is quite a challenge. I think that all this
worry over the pole shift, earth quakes, floods, nukes and all that could be
quite worthless. Sorry fellow worriers. I take the Buddhist position on
being
here now. (Have any of you ever thought of how Buddism is becoming as
fashionable as Latte or being Alternative to make a statment.... it's just
funny,
I bet old Alan Watts is laughing at the whole scene right now!)
I just have faith that The Lord will guide me in times of turmoil, what ever
his
tests may be.
Bohemial
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 17:15:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Lorianna Burkes <lady_enchantmentATnospamyahoo.com>
To: Tom S <t_shermanATnospamhotmail.com>, Kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: ReGuys ??Gays
Message-ID: <19971229011527.11660.rocketmailATnospamsend1a.yahoomail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I have to agree with you Tom. I think that all people on this earth
should be shown the same amount of love and respect, regardless of
their race, sex, religion, or sexual orientation. The Universal
Awakening can never completely take place until there is tolerance and
true love shown to everyone.
Blessed be!
Lorianna
---Tom S <t_shermanATnospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> People who dislike Homosexuals are people programmed to hate ,mostly
> because of there belief systems.
> Tom S
>
> ______________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
_________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free ATnospamyahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 09:35:01 +0800
From: GSDonne <gsdonneATnospamiinet.net.au>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Psalms/update
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19971229013501.0073498cATnospammail.iinet.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
http://www.danwinter.com/psykids/index.html
The quote below came from the above url. Worth visiting just to see what
'blue ray' children/psi kids are about.
The Bible predictions are not set in concrete. Same with other 'New Age'
predictions. eg: Edgar Cayce, Japan sinking into the sea by 1985, as well as
NY. (see reference to NY below)
We create our own reality with our thoughts and emotions. The less we rely
on being 'programmed' by old predictions and mind sets, (read religions)and
live our lives based on our own connection to God/Goddess the better the
future we can create.
Etract;
>NKB: we just listened in the last two weeks to the tapes of Patricia
Cote-Robles. At that time you indicated to me that her
channeling
was close to 99% correct and it was very heart warming
to us and
made us feel great to hear that ... there are over 51%
of people
now of the light, so the earth changes in form of
geophysical changes
are not going to happen - though still a lot of climate
changes - and
the energy of openness and love is exponentiating.
LLAEL: (One of the things that was not true in there
was that we
are not quite in the 4th dimension yet - not until about
middle of 1998...or later.
NKB: Llael, you were very aware from listening to that,
that many of
the earth changes that you had translated just over a
year ago is
changed in form in how it will happen - with the aid
that we are
getting on this planet now. So if Sanka could speak to
an updated
version of earth changes and how it will affect our life
and those
especially of children and what should be the guiding
points we
should know for the next few months or year?
February 18, 1996
LLAEL:Yeah. Some earth changes will happen no matter
what people do.
New York is going to do down, under the sea. And so
will...
NB: How soon is Sanka seeing that for?
LLAEL: 15 years, well, maybe a little less.
NB: Wisconsin?
LLAEL: Everywhere near the great lakes is incredibly
safe, except near the coasts.
NKB: How about what Gordon Michael Scallion says.
At the time when he predicted them, they were all true,
but many >things have changed since then, so a few of them may still come
true and many will not.
end of extract.
Interesting reading: Jane Roberts "Psychic Politics" and 'Nature of Personal
Reality',
"Psychology of Mass Events'
All deal with how we create our own reality on an individual and mass scale.
A prosperous and spiritual New Year to all.:)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 21:06:46 -0600
From: Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic.net>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Private?
Message-Id: <l03010d01b0ccc292c457ATnospam[207.71.51.15]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All:
Someone on this list wrote:
>ps: I noticed that yr response to my private reply to you went to the list
>as well and I have also read what were yr private replies to pple on the
>list. Just a point, but its considered bad 'nettiquete' to post private
>replies to an open list.
>I had a private email (a polite one) posted to a web site once and felt it
>a betrayal of trust and an invasion of privacy.
This is the answer I sent:
>In another list I belong to, people often send messages privately and then
>cc to the list, so I do the same. On this list some people do that, too.
>
>I try very hard to keep private mail private. But if the sender doesn't
>say the note is private, I have to guess.
>
>Some notes say "CC: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com" in the header, and then
>I know. But not all carry that message. My own mail program doesn't seem
>to have a cc function, so my mail never shows it.
>
>If the material doesn't seem to me to be a private matter and it's
>relevant to the list, then I cc to the list. Sometimes - if I'm not sure
>- I just wait a while to see if his message will turn up on the list (I
>get the digest).
>
>One person has asked me specifically to keep that mail private, so I added
>"OFFlist" to the nickname that appears in my address book - that will
>always remind me.
>
>Recently I sent a reply to someone else with a note at the top that said:
>"[I don't know whether this belongs on the list or not, so I'm not CC'ing
>it. If you think it belongs, feel free to send all or part of it to the
>list.]"
>
>I regret having guessed wrong in the case of your note. I'm sending this
>answer to the list without your name on it. Please let me know if your
>latest note was meant to be private so I'll know how to return it.
>
>Ann
>
APPEAL TO ALL: If you send a private message and do NOT want it and/or the
reply sent to the list, please make sure the recipient knows that. It
isn't easy to guess, especially given the sensitive nature of much of the
subject matter on this list.
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 19:50:35 -0800
From: ori <oriATnospameskimo.com>
To: Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic.net>
Cc: Kundalini-l <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: Private? Keep private
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19971228195035.007e9100ATnospammail.eskimo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear Ann,
I agree with the person who wrote to you that mail sent
privately should be kept private. If the response had
been cc'd to the List, then its ok to post to the list.
That is standard netiquette on many lists I've been on over the
last 4 years or so.
>Recently I sent a reply to someone else with a note at the top that said:
>"[I don't know whether this belongs on the list or not, so I'm not CC'ing
>it. If you think it belongs, feel free to send all or part of it to the
>list.]"
If something is sent privately but seems pertinent to the list,
then either the other party can be consulted, or the subject
matter summarized with identity removed.
>But if the sender doesn't say the note is private, I have to guess.
I would say you don't have to guess. Just assume it is private
unless otherwise notified.
APPEAL TO ANN AND ALL: If a message is sent privately, please do not
send it to the list without the ok of the other party. Then there is
no need to guess, especially due to the sensitive nature of much of
the subject matter on this list.
I'm really enjoying your postings and receiving the hand position
descriptions. Glad you joined the list.
Sincerely,
ori
ori oriATnospameskimo.com
http://www.eskimo.com/~ori/ori.html
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:18:06 EST
From: Bacchus976 <Bacchus976ATnospamaol.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Question
Message-ID: <4e42dd6.34a73290ATnospamaol.com>
I realize that the awakening of kundalini comes many times without any type of
prewarranted thoughts or signs, but I am curious about how I can go about
activating my own, or at least become more in touch with it. I do not know
very much about the subject, but I was first exposed to it in a yoga class. I
am only 20 yrs. old and this was Hatha yoga. The exposure was in the arena of
information only, no direct experience. I have no clue where to begin in my
search, or whether I should wait. There is also no one in my area that is
accessible enough for me to talk to about it. I basically need to know what
my options might be and I need to learn more about it. Any suggestions?
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 22:05:06 -0600
From: Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic.net>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Re: Gays
Message-Id: <l03010d02b0ccc4e34fb8ATnospam[207.71.51.132]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mike Stickles <msticklesATnospamantalys.com> wrote:
>....2) All living creatures do *not* have this tendency.
My ex (who said he was bi but was more gay) said that everyone is naturally
bisexual but some of us repress it because of societal conditioning. So I
spent a lot of time reading and thinking about it. I do see that when
animals are deprived of the opposite sex, they turn to the same sex. And I
might do that if I were in a women's prison for years, with no men around.
But barring that sort of unusual circumstance, I find myself strictly and
strongly hetero.
>
"Visic" <magehydroATnospamicon.co.za> wrote:
>There is no curing homosexuality unless it was caused by abuse of a same
>sex parent. Which sometimes can cause homosexuality. I believe its in the
>genetics of a person.
In a college biology book I read that hormones given to a chicken caused it
to change sex and I thought then that homosexuality is probably genetic. I
still think so. And there's a relatively small group in which it's caused
or triggered by abuse or a really weird upbringing, as in "Well of
Loneliness."
>"Gloria Lee" <samyanaATnospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>This idea presented of multiple personality is REALLY
>out there in La La Land...
Absolutely! I know/ have known many gay and bi people, and - just as with
heterosexuals - there's a wide spectrum of personality types, kinds of
problems, degrees of mental health, capacities, interests, etc., etc. In
some gay people it does show in their appearance and behavior, and in
others it doesn't - some of the most masculine and powerful men I've known
are gay. In general, aside from their sexual orientation, they're just
like everybody else.
Mike Stickles <msticklesATnospamantalys.com> wrote:
>3) The "natural tendency" concept of homosexuality/bisexuality is a
>hotly debated concept. Expect this one to remain unresolved (i.e., no
>general consensus among the populace) until either the Second Coming or
>the heat death of the universe, whichever comes first.
I expect it to be resolved by genetic studies. In fact, didn't I hear
recently that one gene has been found that plays a part in homosexuality?
>From: "Visic" <magehydroATnospamicon.co.za>
>This is who I chose to be this lifetime and I must say without being gay
I wouldnt have learnt some things which I now find invaluable emotional
experiences.
In all the former lives I've remembered I've always been strongly
heterosexual, whether male or female. My ex had at least one former life in
which he was gay. If sexual orientation is genetic, then we must have
chosen ours on our way in. So maybe gay people are working on something
different than the things I'm working on - I wouldn't try to guess what.
>"Larry Schmitz" <taniaATnospamcentroin.com.br> wrote:
>.... why do people care about who is gay? Are they bothering you?
Some of my best friends are gay...
Yeah. My mother used to get upset whenever she saw a man on TV who had long
hair. She'd say: "Cut your hair, Buster!" And I'd say, "Why do you care?"
>Gloria Greco <lodpressATnospamintercomm.com> wrote:
>
>Hey folks, somebody just pushed a button, just let it go. Gloria
>
Yeah. Live and let live.
Ann
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 02:17:22 -0600
From: Ann Morrison Fisher <annfisherATnospamstic.net>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Re: Private? Keep private
Message-Id: <l03010d04b0cd0ce8642cATnospam[207.71.50.215]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
ori <oriATnospameskimo.com> wrote:
>I agree with the person who wrote to you that mail sent
>privately should be kept private. If the response had
>been cc'd to the List, then its ok to post to the list.
>
>That is standard netiquette on many lists I've been on over the
>last 4 years or so.
>
>>But if the sender doesn't say the note is private, I have to guess.
>
>I would say you don't have to guess. Just assume it is private
>unless otherwise notified.
>
I send my responses privately and then to the list so that if the recipient
is taking the digest, he won't have to wait for that. I think other people
do, too.
But if I do as you say, all public correspondence will go ONLY to the list,
and whoever's on the digest will just have to wait. Is that what you think
I should do?
Ann
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 02:11:04 -0800
From: mraft <at3ATnospamearthlink.net>
To: gkiefferATnospamnetaxis.com
CC: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Proof]
Message-ID: <34A77737.82FD82A8ATnospamearthlink.net>
Gene,
What is your understanding concerning how one consciously awakens K? What I
mean is, isn't there the need for intensive training in the meditative arts?
And how can this become part of the curriculums of our institutions of higher
learning? Perhaps you are referring to the academic study of the K experience
and not the actual work involved in the awakening of it. Because, in my
limited experience, the need for intensive meditation has always been a
prerequisite to any success in stimulating that "divine power" that lies at
the base of the spine. And this is something I could not concieve of occurring
in our institutions of higher learning without turning them into something
more akin to a monastery-- which is what they use to be thousands of years
ago, come to think of it.
Activating K is a singular undertaking that is best approached with a zealous
mind and body, tempered with discipline and devotion, wouldn't you agree? But
if there is some easier way would someone please let me know?
Thanks for your pieces, Gene, I am finding them a good and inspiring read,
Mike
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 04:52:51 +0000
From: Nancy <NancyATnospamwtp.net>
To: kundalini-1 <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: Private? Keep private
Message-ID: <34A72C4D.6BDEATnospamwtp.net>
Ann Wrote:
But if I do as you say, all public correspondence will go ONLY to the
list,
and whoever's on the digest will just have to wait. Is that what you
think
I should do?
---------------------------------------------------
Dear Ann,
If you want to send an email to both to an individual and cc it to the
list, that's fine. If a reply is sent to the list, it's fair game to
respond, quote material, etc.
However, if I send you a private email--no cc to the list--then I would
feel invaded if you passed on my note to ANYONE or ANY list without my
consent.
I often don't feel comfortable replying online to topics. I've become
paranoid knowing that these lists are archived in some places. That
means that anyone wanting to know about me, my thoughts, can look up my
email address through a search engine.
Also, if replies become personal, it's best to reply personally. For
example, if you and I correspond about a topic that was an offshoot of
kundalini, there's no need to bombard the rest of the list with our chit
chat.
It's easy to see in the "mail to" portion of email to whom the message
was sent. If it's sent to the list, you can reply back to the list. If
it's sent to you individually, don't.
Nancy
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 07:35:55 EST
From: Qwartz <QwartzATnospamaol.com>
To: NancyATnospamwtp.net
Cc: Kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Private? Keep private
Message-ID: <7dd16c7b.34a7992eATnospamaol.com>
In a message dated 97-12-29 06:48:06 EST, you (Nancy) write:
<< It's easy to see in the "mail to" portion of email to whom the message
was sent. If it's sent to the list, you can reply back to the list. If
it's sent to you individually, don't. >>
I agree whole heartedly with Nancy. It's quite a shock to write to someone
privately, then to see it plastered all over the the list for everyone to
read. Privately sent emails are generally sent private for a reason, and I,
for one, would appreciate being asked first if I want my privately sent email
cc'd to the list. Clicking the reply button to anyone's mail will not post to
the list (unless of course the k address is in the "to:" box as well and
normally this is not the case); therefore, someone has to make the deliberate
action to CC the email to the list. That deliberate action should never
morally be taken unless the other person is consulted first....no matter how
harmless or beneficial the receiver of the private email deems the material to
be.
Thank you Ori and Nancy for speaking out on something that ruffles my feathers
a bit. ; ) It just seems like a much more natural and thoughtful process to
consider and honor the feelings of someone in this respect.
Bright Blessings
Pam
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 06:53:36 -0800
From: ori <oriATnospameskimo.com>
To: kundalini-1 <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: List Archives
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19971229065336.007e0240ATnospammail.eskimo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 04:52 AM 12/29/97 +0000, Nancy wrote:
>I often don't feel comfortable replying online to topics. I've become
>paranoid knowing that these lists are archived in some places. That
>means that anyone wanting to know about me, my thoughts, can look up
>my email address through a search engine.
I copied this from the info about the list archives. There does seem
to be a way to suppress your messages from showing up in the archives:
If you do *NOT* want your post archived at Reference.COM,
include the following line as an email header or as the first
line of your message: X-No-Archive: yes
Reference.COM has begun archiving this list as of Dec. 26, 1996
http://www.reference.com/cgi-bin/pn/listarch?list=KUNDALINI-LATnospamexecpc.com
ori
In service to the process of awakening,
oriATnospameskimo.com
http://www.eskimo.com/~ori/ori.html
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 10:41:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Gene Kieffer <gkiefferATnospamnetaxis.com>
To: gsdonneATnospamiinet.net.au
Cc: heartzenATnospamlistserv.servtech.com, lodpressATnospamintercomm.com,
kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com, kundalini-1ATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Science
Message-Id: <199712291541.KAA05670ATnospamdavinci.netaxis.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear Stephen,
Thanks very much for the information on new and better tools for
measuring magnetic fields, chakra energies, etc.
I have no doubt that scientific apparatus will continue to improve
year by year and that measuring subtle energies, nerve energy, psychic
energy, prana, chi, etc., will become commonplace.
But let's say that somebody claims to have this kind of energy
running through his/her system in an extremely powerful manner. Over
the years, we have encountered a great many individuals who say they
have this energy, etc.
But what if these same people are still just ordinary in so far as
their intellectual abilities? If they have Kundalini active in the
highest centers, the brain, they ought to exhibit genius. This is
clearly stated in numerous ancient texts on Kundalini and should be
the first thing anyone thinks about when it comes time to begin
testing Kundalini scientifically. Energy surrounding the chakras is
one thing, but genius is another.
All best wishes,
gene
i
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 11:45:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Gene Kieffer <gkiefferATnospamnetaxis.com>
To: at3ATnospamearthlink.net
Cc: heartzenATnospamlistserv.servtech.com, lodpressATnospamintercomm.com,
kundalini-1ATnospamexecpc.com, kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Institutions
Message-Id: <199712291645.LAA13665ATnospamdavinci.netaxis.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear Mike,
You write that you "could not concieve of" having Kundalini being a
part of the curriculum in our universities, etc.
Here are some thoughts on the matter:
1. Today, many people are awakening Kundalini who have never meditated
nor ever heard of Kundalini. Why?
First off, the main lever responsible for activating Kundalini
is concentration of the mind. Some people concentrate on the Blue Pearl,
some on the pink lotus, some on Christ, some on the Infinite, etc. One
can concentrate on ones art, on a mathematical problem, or whatever.
I would not doubt for a moment that young people deeply absorbed in
Nintendo games, television, etc., might be preparing themselves for
the awakening of Kundalini.
So Kundalini will be activated one way or the other, when the person
is predisposed to it. Of course, hereditary factors are a major
consideration, also. The real question is whether the awakening will
be a healthy one. In many cases, Kundalini becomes malignant. This
no doubt happened with Hitler and other monsters of history.
2. Not too long ago, many of the crafts, trades, and sciences were
jealously guarded and only taught to those who were accepted into the
inner circle of a master. Then, as science spread, these once secret
trades and crafts were opened up and became part of the curriculum in
all of the universities.
The same will happen to the knowledge of Kundalini. There is no
reason at all why every child from the age of, say, 13, should not be
taught about the potential they have to expand their awareness through
the practice of certain mental and physical disciplines. Harsha Luthar
tells us that he began meditating at the age of 7.
Once the world comes to know that Yoga, or other spiritual disciplines,
can lead to genius, there will be a rush to teach young people all there
is to know about Kundalini. We read about the brain drain, how the best
scholars and scientists leave one country for another, according to where
the best opportunities can be found. The United States had benefited
tremendously by attracting the best scientists from other countries.
The cultivation of genius will be a universal practice in the centuries
ahead, beginning in the 21st Century. The world cannot survive through
the 21st Century unless the knowledge of Kundalini becomes universal. We
need only think about this. How can we prevent the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction? We cannot.
At the present moment, there is a great deal of opposition to the idea
of making Kundalini universally known. Organized religion is naturally
opposed to it. This opposition will disappear with the first exchange
of nuclear missiles.
The 21st Century will not resemble at all what most pundits predict.
If the world were to continue on the same course it is on today, the race
would degenerate and stagnate beyond the point of return within less than
two generations. We would have millions of brilliant young scholars and
scientists, no doubt, but they would be lopsided in their development.
One could almost say they would have razor-sharp minds but their hearts
would be cold as ice. Their children--many of them--would grow up to
be heartless, also, but brilliant nevertheless.
Now picture these brilliant young men and women in charge of every
nation's military arsenals. They would be the inventors of weapons that
are at present beyond our imagination, and they would not hesitate to use
them. Since this would be the case, should the world continue on its
present course, we can easily see that something must occur to prevent
it. If it is not prevented, then wars would erupt to bring a halt to
the madness.
So Kundalini is in our future, whether we like it or not. Either we
teach Kundalini as a science or we degenerate and stagnate, producing
crop after crop of brilliant but heartless monsters who are capable of
inventing more and more "toys" that beguile us for a while but lead
to indolence. Even now we have robots to take the place of factory workers.
In the future, half the population will be out of work. What will these
people do, even if the state provided their shelter and food? They must
have a spiritual side to their lives. They will not be satisfed with
the Old Time Religion.
The more we learn about Kundalini the more we come to realize that
Nature (God) is forcing humanity to change direction, away from rank
materialism and towards a more spiritual and more simple way of life.
We need to think in terms of a "Science of the Soul," and when we think
this way, we are led to the inescapable conclusion that Kundalini provides
the knowledge, the incentive and the initiative to develop such a science.
When this happens, the knowledge of Kundalini will be taught in all
major institutions of higher learning, and to some extent, even in
grade school and high school.
Sinceely,
gene
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.